

i thought it was viv but was not sure enough to say so...thanks for the correctionCorrection to my post #391. Apologies, but The Lindens was at #163-#165 and this (see Streetview) would have been the position (today Betfred). It seems to have Victorian features above the shop. It, along with many other properties, was owned by the Machin family.
Below is an auction notice of all their properties, and it includes 20 two storey Easy Row cottages numbered #115- #153 (it refers to High Street numbering), We're given the measurements of the total frontage (nearly 70 yards and area of 4,720 square yards). This lot takes some working through, but we might find some more useful pointers.
It doesn't say specifically if the 'ancient' cottage is owned by the Machins, but chances are it is I suspect.
Source: British Newspaper Archive View attachment 215605

I think this (blue dot) was #163 - #165 High Street and named The Lindens. If so, it means Woolworths was built over the passageway to the right of the Lindens.
Barnabas Road was built directly alongside the line of the NE edge of this building (red dot). So this building position would have been covered over when Woolworths built it's store. Therefore, was this structure (red dot) the old 'ancient' cottage in Benjamin Stone's 1890s photo ?
The only other alternative for the old cottage position would be the building just to the south (yellow dot) where the land was also built over for the Woolworth store.
If you use Lyn's mapping tool link in post #382, you'll see what I'm trying to explain- hopefully!
View attachment 215615

thats possible viv...they were certainly on the high st as we can see lamp posts and what looks like tram lines..Just an idea. But could the row of cottages in LadyPs photo in post #428 just have been named Easy Row although they were actually on High Street. To illustrate, when we've looked at address plaques, court names etc, on houses and entrances to courts on another thread, the plaque/court name didn't necessarily appear on maps. They were just names given to the houses/buildings. And sometimes they referred to multiple houses/buildings in a group. The name of the actual road and building number would appear but not always the name displayed on the plaque.
Hopefully you get my drift.
i agree viv...i am just grateful that we have a photo of easy row..but yes to know how they came to be called that would be very interesting..Yes, Lyn.
What would be interesting to know is how they came to be called/known by the name of 'Easy Row'.
does anyone have a date for the photo of easy row cottages
That's the point I was making in post 433Just an idea. But could the row of cottages in LadyPs photo in post #428 just have been named Easy Row although they were actually on High Street. To illustrate, when we've looked at address plaques, court names etc, on houses and entrances to courts on another thread, the plaque/court name didn't necessarily appear on maps. They were just names given to the houses/buildings. And sometimes they referred to multiple houses/buildings in a group. The name of the actual road and building number would appear but not always the name displayed on the plaque.
Hopefully you get my drift.