You were obviously at Bluebell Railway. I am always pleased to see one of the West Country, Merchant Navy or Battle of Britain class in their original Bulleid 'spam can' form. The de streamlining of the class did not detract from their ability or looks, but somehow their original form somehow typified Bulleid's ability to move design forward in the post war years and also appear different to what Stainier & Gresley had done pre-war. You will notice that although GWR were my railway of choice, I did not mention their only attempt at streamlining....!!!!
GWR was superior design and best Welsh anthracite, the worst slippers were the Jubilees and Patriots out of Bristol especially on a wet day. Apparently, although I never saw them after the triple stop at Braunton, platform to short for the ACE & Devon Belle when with a full complement of coaches on a wet day a banker was often needed to take them with a West Country on up to Woolacombe & Morthoe, meanwhile the GWR 2-6-0s on the trains from Taunton would sometimes avail themselves of the banker, but apparently could get up there without slipping.Oh! You mean the 'Teddy Boston' attempt, Bob.
But GWR locos did not need streamlining, they were elegant and fast.
SPAM Cans find Devon hills an issue at times, they are 'slippers'.
If you want to see a SPAM Can slip and be rescued by a former GWR loco, then watch this. I was there so I know it happened.
[/QUOTE
thanks
Sorry folks, tt seems Part 2 got posted. I have now posted Part 1.I didn't see the rescue?
Dave A
i loved the thrash clag and slip. thanks AlanIf you want to see a SPAM Can slip and be rescued by a former GWR loco, then watch this. I was there so I know it happened.
should have had a class 37 in towIf you want to see a SPAM Can slip and be rescued by a former GWR loco, then watch this. I was there so I know it happened.
was the 25The line has a 37 now but it had a 25 at the time of the video. I did an exchange of locos with another nearby heritage line a couple of years ago. The loco Goliath was from the service train and could not complete its journey until the SPAM can and its train was moved to the passing station. Likewise the A4 (and others). Now the diesel is a banker with visiting charter trains to avoid disruption to an intensive timetable.
John, your comments are appreciated as a GWR disciple, I do understand you points. As a devout IKB (and his father) reader you will note his approach was not unlike you suggest. While he did spend readily (and took a lot of heat) the results he achieved were incredible shifts or improvements in technology, locomotion facilities and services. In many cases less is spent with far fewer gains in the long term. I am not advocating reckless spending but at least in the early days GWR got the results that everyone sharedIt seems to me that being a supporter of a railway company is quite akin to being a supporter of a football team. You have your likes and dislikes, probably formed in childhood, and nobody will cause you to deviate from them. While understanding that the GWR did adhere to good engineering and design, I have to say that my view of them is one of contempt, in that they seemed to spend money for the sake of it. They were, in my myopic view, only slightly better than the Midland, and I never understood the meal they made of their early diesel locomotives, seemingly adopting complication for its own sake. Perhaps growing up within earshot of the Nor'western main line has something to do with it, especially as all the Webb compounds were by then well and truly scrapped and his influence had all but disappeared.
When we made trips to London in the 1950s to take my brother to see various specialists, Dad seemed to favour the Great Way Round, and I have to say that I recall being quite impressed by the sight of KG V at the head of a rake of coaches on Wolverhampton Low Level, but my trips to and from London in the sixties were always via Euston, as were my business visits in latter years.
But not as hazardous a project as the Royal Albert Bridge. The bridge still is impressive outshining its modern road neighbour.It's not the railway so much as the "We're Brunswick Green we can do no wrong" brigade that get under my shirt.
In terms of IKB, I think that the most impressive structure he was involved with has to be Maidenhead Bridge. Those superb flat arches, I bet there were some knees knocking when the supports came out!
John, I have read numerous biography's on IKB, my last trip to China I took three books with me....Read them all on the way there. With everything there are pluses an minus, I thought IKB moved to needle + more than most.It's not the railway so much as the "We're Brunswick Green we can do no wrong" brigade that get under my shirt.
In terms of IKB, I think that the most impressive structure he was involved with has to be Maidenhead Bridge. Those superb flat arches, I bet there were some knees knocking when the supports came out!
what happy times.Alan i was one of the lucky ones who rode on the footplate of a loco from snow hill to Bordesley in 1950s.Our childhood colours or views of most things. Having the GWR at the bottom of my back garden and spending lots of time in the summer riding the towpath of the Stratford Canal, pausing for a long while at the halts between Shirley and Henley-in-Arden, has had a lasing effect on my preference.
I have lived within whistle sound of the GWR since moving to Devon in the mid nineteen fifties.
My memories of other lines are that the LMS was mainly of miserable looking dirty black freight locos.
Of course I was curious about minor lines, seen on vacations, such as the Weston, Clevedon & Portishead, Southwold, Wisbech & Upwell and most lovable of all the Kelvedon & Tollesbury Light.
Sadly the Lynton &Barntaple had closed before my birth but it is slowly being restored with parts of the original now in operation.