Re: Canals of Brum:GALLOP
The notion there were relays of galloping horses around the clock, especially consign perishables, is quite quaint and sorta charming.
It is, though, utterly fantastic.A sturdy horse could trot-canter. That is surely so and some of the olden timers, with access to even older timers (such as Cromwell) can set matter aright.A fast pace horse on some stretches could jog along and no doubt there were relays.
If you, walk unimpared then you average a peregrination on flat of 3 mls per hour.So a horse, once the boat was flowing, at a sturdy trot would likely average, without negotiating locks, 5 mph.10 hrs is 50 mls.But galloping is quite out of the question. If you have ever pulled by yourself a narrow boat - empty - you'll appreciate what a daunt.Some narrow boats laden full could move as much as 70 tonnes. Twelve was ordinary. Once the vessel is flowing it is a matter of maintaining steady pace as sturdy plod. Think of rain, maritime condesation perfused with filth from coal and coke. As marvellous as the notion is of express sleek jobs yanked by galloping horses hurteling perishables to market it is not physically on. Clydesales would have hardly been able to negotiate much of BCN - they'd almost have to kneel down and hobble under some bridges.
Regarding slowing down from a rapid tug: This can effected with swift swish of yer tiller: to and fro. You would want to be with it to do so.
I once owned one which I bought by itself for 10/-.Oak. I was a wee strap of a lad and it took all my strength to lug it without winding down in the canal. I affixed it to one of the lightweight jobs to which the correspondent at this site refers. I can verify from first hand experience it is possible to reduce to still a narrow boat with the swish-swash to and fro rapid manoeuver. If you had horse sense and new the layout you would hardly be in need of resorting to such an extreme of desperation. (The speed limit on canals is 5 mph.)
Barges on the big breadth then I do not know. On a flat with a Clydesdale they could surely manage 5 mph, unless a strong headwind, including of course, gale force conditions, torrential rain, blizzard.
I wish to ask Cromwell doth he remember the BOLINDER single cylinder engine. One almight concusive item. The snapshot of the tugboat with the butties a tow twigged my memory.
Stroll some of the older stretches of canal where the lower fire redbrick bridges are in place and you will see deep cuts done over many years by the tow ropes attached to horses. And of course in the peak hay day of canal freitage then many operated around the clock. Hence gas illumine.
I France women pulled barges. Big pieces. Look that up. Women are more powerful from the waist down than blokes. Of course with intelligent formal disciplined training they can integrate the whole organism. What astonished myself was that the first photo I saw of such action was women pulling by a long stretch of rope by the head! A kind of cushioning scarf with a loop and they leaning forward into it.
I might be completely mistake but that traction seems sub-optimal. Wouldn't it make basic common sense simple logic to employ a waist harness? For either gender. Also I wonder what the problem was with find a horse in France. Even donkey let alone and mule could fare better than a woman lugging by her head. In any case why was it the fella was at the tiller? If she can reproduce the species surely she could steer a barge? "Oh, No Regrets................" Such stuff and nonsense.
Delightful to view the kinder on the narrow boat. What a thrill and delight. With that kind of stimulating growth energy environment I dare say they were for the most part accelerated learners.
To recapitulate: were I a horse you'd never catch me galloping towing a canal boat along the tow path. At the time of those round-the-clock consignments think traffic load as congestion. Notice by many locks there are the equivalent of automobile laybys.Time being premium. Of course the pubs were open around the clock as well so the horses could cool their hoofs while the geezer swigged a libation and gulped down a roast potato with onions and sauce.
I do not know if Cromwell was a nipper - likely way 'afore his time - but how did horse drawn canal boats cross in opposite directions?
The Grand Union springs readily to mind.
By the way that Salford, by the gasworks [?] expanse of water is not a lake. It is a pound. An idea of the volume of boats. There are some submerged which can be salvaged by mechanical pump. The traditional way of sinking was to drill a hole in the bottom about 1" dia..
They sank slowly and were embalmed in the canal. Steel is preferable to iron and if properly primed and sealed with outlast anything other than a glass structure.Phosphor bronze does surface tarnish but doesn't corrode, though I do not know if anybody was so eccentric as to make one of the metal. Aluminium, unless thick, is vulnerable to puncture, such as slob-lout-thug-hooligan-vandal canal dumping by cynical apathetic bozoidals. Terrible pity. Of course even vandals make certain philosophical asssumptions.
The allusion of galloping tow horses in rapid relay made me laugh. Nothing raucous or bellowing in public. It is funny, though.