i agree..i really enjoyed the programmeAgain I enjoyed part 2 of Jay Blades refreshing approach last night looking at a wide range of 19th Century trades and industries most of which are relevant, strongly connected to my personal family history research and growing up in the Midlands. My own personal highlights were as follows:-
- Jewellery Quarter /School of Jewellery in Hockley
- Cadbury's in Bournville
- Sunbeam Cycles in Coventry and Motor Bikes in Wolverhampton
- Women working in the small 'chain making' and as 'nailers' in Dudley areas
These are all worth separate programmes in there own rights . Already looking forward to the last programme in the series next week. Keep up the good work Jay and Channel 5 team
Indeed, When he was first featured in the programme "Money for Nothing" he was working out of a workshop in Wolverhampton.In his other program it said his workshop was in Wolvehmpton
I guess it's a bit like us not calling it "Landan", when we are down there .@Alberta is it Jay Blades you are referring to?
I haven't seen the programme but I can tell you that he is from Hackney in London which would be why he pronounces Birmingham like that - something quite a few Londoners do ......and yes, it's annoying!
What a thing for a guide to do, she should be ashamed of herself.Had a day in Worcester last week and found myself looking at the tomb of King John in the Cathedral. The guide was talking to two young tourists. She put them off going to B'ham as 'it wasn't historical' compared to Civil War Worcester. Turned out she was a retired sociologist from Sutton!
I guess I'd have sent them to the Jewellery Quarter? But I did think about Birmingham and history.
I'm looking forward to watching Jay Blades.
I absolutely agree. The problem with history is it becomes divisive between the academic and everyday people and is used as a way of separating them from the other. People also take ownership of history and use it to define themselves with superior knowledge. I often encounter this with church guides etc.I feel there is and should be a place for all types of history. They should be seen as a part of the whole subject and shouldn't be in competition with each other. There is a place for the study of the Civil War for example alongside the study of social and economic history. Local history has it's place alongside British and World history, whether that guide in Worcester likes it or not. For example, I have been to the D-Day beaches, to the Somme, Ypres, Dachau, the Palace of Versailles, the Colosseum, Windsor Castle, Bosworth Field and to Worcester Cathedral. An interest in one type of history, should not in my opinion, preclude an interest in another.
Absolutely MWS and those unfortunately are either academics (who sometimes consider themselves to be elites) or the elites or so called aristocracy’s. I am a huge fan of Churchill but much of what he did was manipulation, many times for the right reason.Most history is written by people with an agenda - from Bede to Churchill.