I know I am a bit of an idealist –when in retrospect I wonder how many elected who to high office would keep their pledge. .
If the sovereign nation of the United States of America were about to be violently overthrown, we have no doubt that tactical nuclear weapons would be deployed against the invading forces, and perhaps the capitals of those forces would be flattened by nuclear bombs.-
What may be used as a show to deter others can be misunderstood as a quest for global domination, and to humble the powerless . . . If the existing nuclear powers were serious about nuclear non-proliferation, they would minimize their atomic thresholds to levels that nobody might feel humiliated from.
Please don’t get me wrong. I’m not a dove, I don’t believe in pacifism and think free nations need to be strong to be respected, and that such strength includes military power.
(Each year on August 6th the news media pictures, stories and editorials, tell of the horror of the US using atomic bombs. We see the photos of Japanese victims, dead and alive, their scars tainting the morality of the bomb's developers, but where are the photos and details of our veterans' graves and those still living with the horror of mortal combat with, and imprisonment by the Japanese including some of those in my dad’s 605 Squadron?
For sixty-two years since winning this war for a meaningful peace, misinformed persons over the world accept from an unapologetic Japan, its ongoing despicable campaign to lament, decry, and condemn atomic death at the hands of the United States of America. . . But where is the cry to remember history's fanatical and depraved acts of a militaristic Japan killing and raping its way conquering all of Asia... before the bomb was dropped? )
However, it was a different time in history and one we will never forget. . .
Strength is a composite beast, and most of a country’s strength is actually educational, environmental and economic parameters. In that very context, engagement is seen as the far more promising approach compared to military threats.
Then, there is also a consistency problem. Why should Iran feel threatened, if other aggressive dwarf countries such as Pakistan, Israel and North Korea are allowed to get away with atomic non-proliferation?
I wonder myself, how my above thinking could be applied in the current Iran crisis. Well, let’s look at the crisis from an Iranian point of view. Why shouldn’t the country have nuclear power and weapons? Other economic Mickey Mouse countries as the mentioned North Korea, and Pakistan, enjoy the bomb. Isn’t it great to have parades on the main plaza with tanks and rockets? It helps a lot to boost morale, particularly when the kids at home have nothing got to eat, and the totally failed and corrupt governments have lost sight of the last economic silver lining.
Nuclear weapons are, in many ways, like the desperate barking of a hungry and weakened stray dog.
This said, the future Iranian bomb has a particularly worrying aspect.
What to do? Classical appeasement has failed already. Yet, continuing persistent engagement (rather than sabre-rattling) is seen as the only option. Facing continued deafness, the event of a total oil embargo should be flagged. Last not least - it is the mix of half-hearted engagement, and empty threats that have caused 50 % of the crisis. The other 50 % stem from a ruthless, hardened and ambitious leader, surrounded by crooked and corrupt clerics, willing to test the edge of war.
Be it as it may, there is only one certainty among the many uncertainties: nuclear weapons will continue to haunt the world. The evil genie has escaped from Pandora’s Box, and seems unwilling to return.
Let me finish this article with a reflection - We are far from respecting or tolerating each other, and non-human life is hardly respected at all. When will the day come where we can see another human as a brother, and sky, earth and ocean are free from warfare? Only then, so I believe, can words such as peace and freedom live up to their fullest dimension.