I seem to remember small lockers at Boulton road only. A member of my class prided himself in opening as many locks as he could from a large assortment of keys he carried with him. He did not have much luck with the very few combination locksl.
As I attended HTS from Jan 1951 it was during thelast term of the original 2 yr period that an extrayear was offered to qualify for subjectsin some form of institute known to pupils as "The Common Preliminary Course" To this day I still dont know to what course it was connected.
Our teaching was consequently ratcheted up a gear or two to qualify for this body However, after the first termof the 3rd yr it seems that the then "O Level" qualification was adopted by the school.
It was soon noticable that the former standard of teaching was slightly more advanced than that of the "O" Level requirement
Such was the standardof teaching at HTS I am glad to say I obtained 5 "O" Levels, even though we were taught through conflicting school corriculums.
Not to leave "Ozzie" out of my memories, I can bring to mind two examples of his style One involved the need for us to name the parts of speech of a sentence that went something like "That that that that is ,is not that that that is not that !!" He had afield day with us nearly reducing us to suicide What planet did he come from?
His marking of our books was also very strange. If a book was not handed in on time then all marks were lost with a poorer end of term position.He often choose to mark books at his desk. This meant standing at his side!!! He would initially give a mark ,say out of twenty, followed by a deduction of 1/2 apoint for blots crossing out
which might bring the work down to 15 out of twenty He then read the piece knocking off one markfor each missing full stop ,comma ,question mark ,spelling mistake,
lack of capital letters and paragraphs. Hence, it was impossible to ever get full marks no matter how good the content ; one could finish up with 5 ouy of 20 !!