To Sheri and others
I have only recently found the webring site, and only today read the Cadbury thread. The film was interesting. I think some may have been extracted from a cadbury film of about 1950 (?) that was on sale in tape form in the Cadbury World shop a few years ago. I worked for the firm for 36 years, about 10 of them at bournville, and developed quite an interest in the firm. In connection to two things in your posts. First there is no archive site for the firm that would help you in your quest for you relatives. I suspect details such as this have been destroyed anyway. Certainly they apparently have no record of my addresses earlier than my present address. This would probably be true of many firms. Also, you mention that married women didn't work in 1908. that may be true, but shortly after they were employed. However they had to use separate cloakrooms to unmarried girls, as it was thought that they might discuss things best left unheard by innocent unmarried girls. This was before my time (started 1967), but around 1972 I remember seeing two sets of ladies
cloakrooms very close together in the chocolate block (I think), one marked women, the other girls. This was presumably a remnant. In the same vein, at one time areas mainly occupied by girls (ie packing chocolates) could not be entered by men other than specially approved and identified ones known as "trustees".
Following a much earlier question regarding licensed premises, when the club gained its license (late 1960s?), although Mr Adrian (Cadbury), as he was known, followed the flow, Mr Paul (who had retired as chairman about 4 years previously) was definitely against it. I was assurred by Frank Stanley, who was in charge of the library and archives, that when Mr Paul visited the archives (which were then next to the club), he crossed Bournville Lane when leaving so as not to go any closer to it than necessary.
Hope these things may be of interest
mikejee