As Charles birth is reg with mmn Salmon I checked for Rose and the birth I found was 1868 and reg as Sarah Rose.On the 1939 register (findmypast) Rose appears to be listed at 183 Loyells (Lozells?) Road.
yes jan as the lozells road one gives her dob as 1870As Charles birth is reg with mmn Salmon I checked for Rose and the birth I found was 1868 and reg as Sarah Rose.
Which, I think, rules out the Lozells Road entry.
Maybe her entry is still redacted for some reason?
As Charles birth is reg with mmn Salmon I checked for Rose and the birth I found was 1868 and reg as Sarah Rose.
Which, I think, rules out the Lozells Road entry.
Maybe her entry is still redacted for some reason?
yes jan as the lozells road one gives her dob as 1870
I'm sorry that it looks as though I have led you off on another tangent by mention of my great aunt, Rose! (I just don't know why so many aspects of my most recent family history involve so much complication). In the morning, I'll explain, in summary, just how Rose Myers fits into things. And also how this single glimpse I have of her ?Harborne? Road home in my memory connects with the known facts I have and the further information you have just provided. My brother was able to see quite a bit of what was going on – and, thankfully, recorded what he remembered decades later – but I suspect that even he would have been astonished at some of the possible revelations and additions.
Thanks so much.
Chris
MWS, thanks for those comments. I have to say that I am deeply conscious of the effort and interest shown by you, Janice, Lyn and others in connection with the various aspects of my own family history so far raised in this thread. So grateful for it as well - and hopeful that you'll feel able to maintain it for a while longer! Perhaps the subject is a bit unusual, in that there is an existing history in existence, there exist first-hand accounts from the last 125 years and I am able to illustrate it with many images surviving for a similar period. The existing History was, as you know, created by my late elder brother and, knowing his character and methods, I can feel certain that the research work done was undertaken with rigour and complete honesty. If he felt doubt about anything that would have been made clear. Much of the earliest work, not discussed here, had to be conjectural and that was always stated. What he did not have was of course the benefit of three further national censuses, goodness knows how many other accessible records which have appeared over the last 30 years and the opportunity to carry out searches on them.I don't mind tangents. If requests get a bit more involved I sometimes do a bit of a tree to keep track of people and then if I find something interesting (which is more often than not) I look deeper and the tree grows. Your tree is interesting, Chris, made more so by yours and your brother's recollections. There are a number of fascinating things I've came across which I hesitate to bring up as they are a little further back or involve some of your more distant relatives.
chris never worry about us getting fed up or bored of helping out...your brother did so well given his limited resources and you have done well in getting your family in some order...i always feel that however many years we research for there will always be something else to uncover especially given just how many new records are being added and its so much fun finding out new facts about our ancestors worts and all ..having said that my family do not seem to have had many worts much to my disappointmentMWS, thanks for those comments. I have to say that I am deeply conscious of the effort and interest shown by you, Janice, Lyn and others in connection with the various aspects of my own family history so far raised in this thread. So grateful for it as well - and hopeful that you'll feel able to maintain it for a while longer! Perhaps the subject is a bit unusual, in that there is an existing history in existence, there exist first-hand accounts from the last 125 years and I am able to illustrate it with many images surviving for a similar period. The existing History was, as you know, created by my late elder brother and, knowing his character and methods, I can feel certain that the research work done was undertaken with rigour and complete honesty. If he felt doubt about anything that would have been made clear. Much of the earliest work, not discussed here, had to be conjectural and that was always stated. What he did not have was of course the benefit of three further national censuses, goodness knows how many other accessible records which have appeared over the last 30 years and the opportunity to carry out searches on them.
The existence of a History does of course raise its own problems. What I have to do (I am learning) is to ensure that any new aspect which I raise and cause you and others to delve into is qualified by somehow advising you about what I know already and saving you from quoting and discussing discoveries which, for one reason or another, I know to be probably irrelevant. This isn't easy – quoting chunks of the existing History isn't always feasible without everything becoming totally indigestible. And of course, who knows whether something new is, after all, highly relevant..... The Sarah Rose/Harborne Road aspect is a case in point. It was really a careless, almost throw away request from me because I knew that I had in my mind a glimpse from 80 years ago of one tiny aspect of my family history which could sit fairly comfortably with my memories of Mrs Black and Grandpa Tovey just up the road which I was mentally drafting. But then it appears there might be complications, even with all that!
If you are happy to carry on with this - and I really hope you all are – what I should like to do is tidy up the Rose Myers/Tovey question by my having a good think about what has been added to it and then jotting down what I can dig out from my personal memory of the High Street cottage and its occupants; and of Auntie Rose nearby. And posting it here for the record. After that I think I can safely leave all the additional information already posted here on the five Bannister sisters to be pulled together by me at a later date. (How I transmit the finished record to you subsequently I shall have to sort out). Tidying up the Harborne matters would leave us free to explore further new aspects, of which you have made a tantalising mention. So I am asking for your patience for a day or two to allow me to get up to date on where we are - in the hope that your interest doesn't fade in the meantime!
Another image of Auntie Rose (b. 1868) in the meantime. Probably the early/mid 1920s, when living with Julia and Maurice in Wheeley's Road, Edgbaston.
Chris
View attachment 210255