totally agree viv...without the women workers the wars would not have been won...as you said their work was dirty and dangerous..no health and safety...one wrong move in the munitions factory and they were blown to bits...respectGreat photos Mark of women munitions workers in WW1. Many of these photos look like publicity material, everyone happy and clean. But the reality was a dangerous and dirty job.
Hi Vivienne - posed shots - in most cases I think yes. Wolseley - not sure - as I said at the top because of the nature of the subject some do not have much detail on the captions. I have copied sets for Kynochs, Canal work, Railways, ATS recruitment and a munitions factory in Coventry which I will try to continue to post tonight. Also copied sets of visits from Montgomery and Churchill, loads of posters and many of bomb damage in Birmingham and Coventry which I will post onto the most appropriate threads. The IWM website looks like an absolute goldmine - I've hardly scratched its surface so far! Easily as good if not better than the Historic England and National Railway Museum websites!Great photos Mark of women munitions workers in WW1. Many of these photos look like publicity material, everyone happy and clean. But the reality was a dangerous and dirty job.
I wondered if any of the photos were of the Wolseley factory when they made munitions, my grandmother worked there 1914 onwards.
When I served my apprenticeship late 50’s early 60’s I would say 80% of our machines were belt driven. We were a machine tool company and had lots of machines. When you heard that “SNAP” of a belt letting go, you ducked down as low as you could go! I was lucky, many not so!Not only dangers of being blown up, but look how close they were working to those leather belts driving the machines. Certainly no health and safety. When I worked at McKecknie Brothers in Ladywood in late 40s my uncle was the works photographer and had to take photographs of all accidents, many of them caused by the leather drive belts. Some very blood curdling incidents.
yes alan aout 14 years old in a lot of casesThe younger girls appear to be school age or are recently left in many of these photographs.
You're just the calibre of worker we're looking for.Thats all for tonight folks - will try to post more tomorrow including an explanation of what the £$%& is about to happen to this poor girl.....View attachment 189211
OK - from last nights quiz question - so who and where is this?????Thats all for tonight folks - will try to post more tomorrow including an explanation of what the £$%& is about to happen to this poor girl.....View attachment 189211
Great photos Mark! The B&W looks really great.........Here is a puzzle - the captions all say "Great Central Railway Birmingham" - but the Great Central came nowhere near Birmingham from what I can research - Rugby or Leicester were about as close as it got according to this map from Wikipedia:- View attachment 189255
The only thing I can think of is that the locomotive was being serviced in Birmingham (you can see Great Central on one of the tenders, and also a building in the background that looks like it cound be Tyseley works) - I suppose in wartime they would have had to service anything they could - any thoughts anyone?
Anyway the photos are a damn good set and who am I to argue with the Imperial War Museum - so here we go - all dated 1918:-
View attachment 189256
View attachment 189259
View attachment 189257
View attachment 189258
View attachment 189260
View attachment 189261
View attachment 189262
View attachment 189263
only just spotted your photo viv...nothing more annoying than having a photograph that shows our rellies but we dont know where they are..no idea what those boards are thoughThis is the Drews Lane munitions workers - taken about 1917. My grandmother (age 19) and her sister are on this photo, but not sure which ones. I've posted this before, but only just noticed the boards beneath the central man's legs. Are these items they were making ?
View attachment 189220