In 1953, when people 'saved up' to have a baby, would it have been feasible that when twins were born (at the B'ham Maternity Hospital, QE) but weren't affordable, that one would have been kept and one given up for adoption?
My brother was born in 1953. Starting about 15 or 20 years ago, in a completely different part of the country, where I lived then, I occasionally saw a man who was the double of my brother. It used to make my insides somersault as it was such a strange feeling! One day, my daughter was with me and saw him, and she said it made her feel slightly sick as it was such a weird feeling to see 'her uncle' who wasn't her uncle! Some years later I bumped into him at work and spoke to him. It turned out that even close-up he looked like my brother. His date of birth was 3 days from my brother's date of birth. His likes, dislikes and hobbies were the same as my brother's. He was not aware of having been adopted and his mother was his birth mother as far as he knew, and he had not been born in Birmingham to his knowledge. I bumped into him once more and showed him a photo of my brother, and he agreed it looked like himself!
My brother's entries on genealogy sites is 'normal' ie no mention of a twin. Back in 1953, is it possible that a 'spare' baby, that couldn't be afforded, would have had a 'fake' date of birth and birth certificate, centred around the adoptive parents?
Incidentally, I'm no longer in that job and I've moved away from where I used to see this man.
My brother was born in 1953. Starting about 15 or 20 years ago, in a completely different part of the country, where I lived then, I occasionally saw a man who was the double of my brother. It used to make my insides somersault as it was such a strange feeling! One day, my daughter was with me and saw him, and she said it made her feel slightly sick as it was such a weird feeling to see 'her uncle' who wasn't her uncle! Some years later I bumped into him at work and spoke to him. It turned out that even close-up he looked like my brother. His date of birth was 3 days from my brother's date of birth. His likes, dislikes and hobbies were the same as my brother's. He was not aware of having been adopted and his mother was his birth mother as far as he knew, and he had not been born in Birmingham to his knowledge. I bumped into him once more and showed him a photo of my brother, and he agreed it looked like himself!
My brother's entries on genealogy sites is 'normal' ie no mention of a twin. Back in 1953, is it possible that a 'spare' baby, that couldn't be afforded, would have had a 'fake' date of birth and birth certificate, centred around the adoptive parents?
Incidentally, I'm no longer in that job and I've moved away from where I used to see this man.