• Welcome to this forum . We are a worldwide group with a common interest in Birmingham and its history. While here, please follow a few simple rules. We ask that you respect other members, thank those who have helped you and please keep your contributions on-topic with the thread.

    We do hope you enjoy your visit. BHF Admin Team

Seeking help re: location of 266 Highgate Rd, Birmingham in 1901

Brigitte L.

Brummie babby
Hello all,

I hope you’ve all had a lovely Christmas and New Year. :)

I’ve never posted here before but I’ve browsed a lot and found a lot of helpful info whilst researching my family history, so I figured I’d see if anyone here is able to please offer me some guidance?

I’m currently researching my Norton family ancestors who, according to the 1901 census, lived at house 3, back of 266 Highgate Road, Balsall Heath, Birmingham. However, I’ve looked at a number of maps and have been unable to locate this house on any of them.

I’ll take you through my working-out process, as it were. Firstly, the only map I’ve ever been able to find of Birmingham that contains house numbers is “OS 1:1,250/1:2,500, 1944-1974” (not sure if I’m citing that correctly..) so that’s what I started with to get my bearings around the house numbering side of things. However, by the time this map was surveyed, no. 266 no longer seems to exist—it appears to have been demolished to make way for a bus depot (see screenshot below). In the screenshot you can see that the buildings either side of the depot are numbered 248 and 282 respectively, so the area in between should have contained no. 266 at some point.

IMG_8582.jpeg

So, the next map I looked at was “Birmingham and its Environs–Warwickshire XIV.9.25 Surv: 1888, Pub: 1889” (see second screenshot, below), which doesn’t contain house numbers but does show the buildings on Highgate Rd prior to the omnibus depot: you can see further houses in its place, as well as a Methodist chapel (which was listed as no. 278 on the 1901 census, so that matches with the above map nicely). However, even on this map it’s difficult to see where the “back-to-back” houses would be in this layout—at first I thought maybe where that long row of houses behind the chapel is (see red arrow on below screenshot), however, this is marked as “Albert Place” on the map, which is the address they would have used on the census, you’d imagine? Also, if you take nos. 248 and 282 on the 1940s map above and locate these on the 1889 map below (without numbers), and count the buildings between them, there aren’t enough buildings there to make up the difference in house numbers: I mapped them out on the below screenshot using purple for known addresses (as per the 1940s map and 1901 census) and blue to fill in the building numbers between, and there are just too few buildings, so that’s got me stumped.

IMG_8580.jpeg

I guess what I was wondering is if anyone here could help point me in the direction of a map that contains the houses at the back of no. 266 Highgate Road, and if anyone has another reliable map besides the 1940s–70s map that lists building numbers—that would also be greatly appreciated.

(After that my next step would be to find any historical photos I can of the address, but I understand I’d likely need to make a new thread for that, since this is in the Mapping section.)

Thank you in advance for any help you can provide! :)

- Brigitte
 
The street would have been renumbered between 1897 and 1899, as the part with the omnibus depot had previously been Thomas Street. By 1901 the bus depot was in place, so presumably another renumbering must have occurred if 266 is correct. Is it possible that 266 is the census number , and has been taken as the house number.
 
The street would have been renumbered between 1897 and 1899, as the part with the omnibus depot had previously been Thomas Street. By 1901 the bus depot was in place, so presumably another renumbering must have occurred if 266 is correct. Is it possible that 266 is the census number , and has been taken as the house number.
no mike not census number...here is the 1901 census for george norton at 3/266 highgate road so the bus depot must have been built after the 1901

norton 1901.png
 
hi brigitte and a happy new year..i am sure someone will be able to help but could i just have the first names of your norton rellies please..thanks

lyn
Hi Lyn,

Yes of course, no worries :) My second great-grandfather-and-mother George Dean Norton and Elizabeth Annie Norton (née Crosse), and their children William Dean, George, Lily Annie, Ada Emma, and Amy Elizabeth Norton.
 
I am not sure you have 248 in the right place.

248 is almost opposite Mole Street (marked in yellow)
View attachment 216419
you’re right, now that I look at it like that I can see my mistake. I was trying to line it up with that x on the road where it marks “388”, coz that seemed like the nearest “landmark” to use to align the buildings—if you look at the other map I marked the number 248 on, the x 388 is very close by but maybe it’s not in exactly the same position in both maps?
 
On the 1901 it lists the houses back of 266. Then the church and then 278.

View attachment 216429
Ahh, yes I see! I thought the chapel was part of that address 278, since the line that it’s written on is a continuation of the family above it in no. 6 Bk. 266, and the person on that same line is a baby boy, which wouldn’t have lived alone in a chapel?

IMG_8601.jpeg
But idk, I get confused a bit sometimes by the way the censuses are set out!
 
1901 rates book lists 266 and its backhouses next to 278 a beerhouse.
Thank you for looking into this for me! So what I’m hearing is that the depot was likely built over the area where 266 was (in or around 1913, as noted above) and previous or subsequent re-numberings have muddied where the original position of the house and backhouses were. I really wish they had building numbers on all the maps!!
 
The street would have been renumbered between 1897 and 1899, as the part with the omnibus depot had previously been Thomas Street. By 1901 the bus depot was in place, so presumably another renumbering must have occurred if 266 is correct. Is it possible that 266 is the census number , and has been taken as the house number.
Yes I noticed that stretch of road had previously been Thomas Street and wondered if that might affect the numbering—there’s so much to wrap your head around when working this stuff out, isn’t there!
 
Btw thank you all for your replied so far and also sorry for the late reply on my part! I’m not used to getting such thoughtful replies so quickly on forums! I can tell you all love what you do and derive enjoyment from helping others with these queries, so that is very much appreciated on my end! ❤️
 
Btw thank you all for your replied so far and also sorry for the late reply on my part! I’m not used to getting such thoughtful replies so quickly on forums! I can tell you all love what you do and derive enjoyment from helping others with these queries, so that is very much appreciated on my end! ❤️
always happy to help...you may find this map site useful you can move the map around and if you move the blue dot to the left the map fades out and shows us what is there now and you can also put in different roads and street names..as you can see where no 266 and the back houses were are taken up by the bus depot also as you can see the queens head pub is still there but its no longer the queens head click on link below...lyn


 
always happy to help...you may find this map site useful you can move the map around and if you move the blue dot to the left the map fades out and shows us what is there now and you can also put in different roads and street names..as you can see where no 266 and the back houses were are taken up by the bus depot also as you can see the queens head pub is still there but its no longer the queens head click on link below...lyn


Thank you! Yes I’ve used that website but I’m still wrapping my head around how it works! It seems really useful though—I’ll have a bit more of a play around on it.

Btw do you know of any maps on that site that show house numbers? Besides the one we’re looking at from 1940s? It’d be good to have a source for house numbers prior to the 20th century!
 
Back
Top