Leanne
I realise now that my last post may be a bit confusing. For some reason I forgot you had given me the number in John St (!!-getting old), and was working back from the census, in which numbers are not listed.
Before 1845 (in Birmingham at least, as far as I know), the directories only included a list by name and by occupation (sometimes only listing by name).There was no listing of occupants in individual streets. Therefore I am not able to comment on no 30 in 1841. In 1845 no 30 was listed as occupied by Joseph Clark, cloths salesman, though, (it may or may not be a coincidence that no 32 was occupied by William Clark). Of course, Charles could still be living at no 30 as a lodger , or in a flat (though I don’t think they used that word then)., with the business side of the building kept separate. That was not uncommon.
As a matter of interest, where did you get the address no 30 from, as it is not on the 1841 census.
If what I have said is still confusing, please let me know and I’ll try to explain better
Mike