Artem made the bull, which is an animatronic giant theatre prop built round a telehandler. It was designed to be a performance rather than a permanent display. I imagine a good deal of alteration would be necessary for a longer lasting display. You can read about the construction here. https://www.artem.com/portfolio/895
In the article linked by lyn @ #256 , Artem director Mike Kelt said, "There's bits in it that have to be taken out, so if it was going to exist forever, somebody would have to pay for those bits to stay in it. That isn't an enormous sum of money, but I think storage is the problem. And to move it somewhere is also a problem. It takes quite a bit of effort to move it."Artem made the bull, which is an animatronic giant theatre prop built round a telehandler. It was designed to be a performance rather than a permanent display. I imagine a good deal of alteration would be necessary for a longer lasting display. You can read about the construction here. https://www.artem.com/portfolio/895
We will see. It would need secure weatherproof storage. Because it would need to be protected from vandalism, wouldn't it ? Personally, I don't see the imperative to fossilise a moving art work. I do think the bull is an amazing creation moving and breathing fire. I'll be sure to see it in the metal and foam as opposed to on screen before the games are over, just in case.In the article linked by lyn @ #256 , Artem director Mike Kelt said, "There's bits in it that have to be taken out, so if it was going to exist forever, somebody would have to pay for those bits to stay in it. That isn't an enormous sum of money, but I think storage is the problem. And to move it somewhere is also a problem. It takes quite a bit of effort to move it."
It therefore seems, that if the money could be found to pay "for the bits" and temporary storage for it can be sourced (if necessary) and it can also be moved to storage/a permanent site (as it was from Perry Barr to the city centre, earlier this week), then this could happen after all. Where there's a will there's a way.
View attachment 172043
Derby has 1500 permanent seats, with a flexibility for another 2,000 on the infield, so it holds around half as much as The London Stadium does.The London Stadium holds over 6,000 people= Derby considerably less.
We can't get enough bulls can weWhat does Birmingham need another bull for, they already have one. They also had a Bull Ring until bright spark changed the name.
Also watching from Oz mate. Proud as punch we are.Wow. So proud of my home city. Watching from Australia, the whole ceremony was so professional and spectacular enough to rival any recent games of any note. For us on this forum it also covered so much history of our city, the things we made, ' from pins to a ships anchor' my Dad reckoned. Was that anchor for the Titanic made in the Black Country? God bless 'the chain mekkers', covered our social and literary history too. Back in the day we embraced those who arrived from around the Commonwealth, in my day we lived and worked happily alongside one another. Congratulations to those behind the production. Only minor gripe- I would have preferred Jeff Lynne and ELO to Duran Duran
'Tetty' Jervis (Johnson's wife) was from Leicestershire and the widow of Henry Porter, a unsuccessful Birmingham merchant. Johnson was associated with Thomas Warren who published the Birmingham Journal. Johnson lived 1709-1784, so he saw early industrial Birmingham. He is far ruder about the Scots! He seems to have had Tourette's, so a brusque manner was his usual way.Noticed that Doctor Johnson managed to be depicted in the Opening Ceremony, despite…
“Dr Samuel Johnson, who married a Birmingham woman, handed out to that city one of the large insults of the 18th century. He called the inhabitants "boobies" who were not to be compared with the men and women of Lichfield, "a city of philosophers."
Well this is the result of the cogitations of three philosophers:Noticed that Doctor Johnson managed to be depicted in the Opening Ceremony, despite…
“Dr Samuel Johnson, who married a Birmingham woman, handed out to that city one of the large insults of the 18th century. He called the inhabitants "boobies" who were not to be compared with the men and women of Lichfield, "a city of philosophers."
Like shackles and leg irons you mean? Made in Birmingham and used in Guantánamo. Everyone is a prisoner of the prejudices of their own time. Even us. But thanks for the evil philosophers cut and paste job.Whereas those from Birmingham concentrated on doing something useful and producing things of value to the population.
Thanks for your post Viv. I watched the TV coverage of the swimming at Sandwell last night and saw amazing performances in a beautiful new pool. The para athletes are also incorporated into the same games (unlike the Olympics) and represented on the TV presentation team. One could be sceptical about the Commonwealth as it came about because of the British Empire, but these games, like contemporary young Birmingham are diverse. One of the things which drew me to this forum is that it features history in the title as opposed to 'heritage.' With history we take the rough with the smooth. We only have a symbolic bull, because bulls were once baited with dogs in the city centre. There are many people with Irish connections in Birmingham, only history, as opposed to heritage, will explain why the Republic of Ireland is not a member of the Commonwealth. With hope too for the future, DerekWherever historical references are included in these ceremonies inevitably there’s always scope for damning comments about past injustices and prejudicial beliefs. But, although prejudice still exists, I’m thankful we can at least demonstrate we’re moving forward through sport, where there’s a more inclusive culture emerging. Women’s football being a perfect example. As a woman it gives me hope. And it sets young people a good example. Viv.