• Welcome to this forum . We are a worldwide group with a common interest in Birmingham and its history. While here, please follow a few simple rules. We ask that you respect other members, thank those who have helped you and please keep your contributions on-topic with the thread.

    We do hope you enjoy your visit. BHF Admin Team

William Smith, sawyer, upper Marshall street 1851 census

Brotog

proper brummie kid
AI search informs me that a family headed by William Smith, sawyer, aged 32, was living in 29 Upper Marshall Street on the evening of the 1851 census. Can anyone please verify this for me as I am very suspicious of information provided by AI? Thank you.
 
That's a tall order as the 1852 directory lists over 50 people living in Birmingham called William Smith. I can't search by address on Ancestry and any name search brings up all the children named William Smith as well. :rolleyes:
 
That's a tall order as the 1852 directory lists over 50 people living in Birmingham called William Smith. I can't search by address on Ancestry and any name search brings up all the children named William Smith as well. :rolleyes:
Thank you so much for trying! Really appreciate it!
 
From the 1851 census at 29 Upper Marshall Street it is a Williams family
Thank you so much. I was very sceptical about the information provided by AI….it seems I was right to check this….this is what it gave me….all sounded very plausible!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2711.png
    IMG_2711.png
    565.4 KB · Views: 10
Thank you so much. I was very sceptical about the information provided by AI….it seems I was right to check this….this is what it gave me….all sounded very plausible!
That would be a tremendous research tool if it gave the correct results, I've searched on findmypast for the family in Birmingham in 1851 but had no luck yet.
 
What actually was the question you asked of AI for it to give such a detailed answer ?
I started by asking why a child born in Kenilworth might be baptised in Birmingham instead of Kenilworth. It explained that almost certainly the family would have moved for employment possibilities. It then offered to search for the family, so I offered the information of the sawyer’s name. This is what it came up with. 1851 and 1861 entries from the census. It was such a detailed reply that I became suspicious.
 
That would be a tremendous research tool if it gave the correct results, I've searched on findmypast for the family in Birmingham in 1851 but had no luck yet.
I had searched for this family for decades….and had discounted the Birmingham baptism because I knew the family had lived in Kenilworth in 1845 when Hannah, the daughter, was born. All of my searches had been in the Kenilworth/Leamington area. Thanks for commenting!
 
Could this be them in Leamington
Thank you for showing this….I was quite interested in this family for a long time and followed it through the years of census returns because the child Hannah’s age seemed to fit with that of my great grandmother…..but the father was a bricklayer in every census, and never a sawyer….so I could never be certain I had the right family. Thanks again for your help!
 
How do you know "your" Wiliam was a sawyer?
On Hannah’s marriage certificate of 2nd. October 1865 in Holy Trinity, Coventry it states profession of father: Sawyer. The Leamington William Smith never deviates from bricklayer on every census return. I find it difficult to believe that she could be mistaken. Thank you for going to so much trouble for me!
 
On the 1861 census there is a William Smith (Sawyer) at 111 Great Charles Street, may be remarried wife 25 years old
 

Attachments

  • william-smith-1861-census.jpg
    william-smith-1861-census.jpg
    59.4 KB · Views: 5
  • Appreciate
Reactions: MWS
Another thing that started me looking towards Birmingham as being very likely was that I had discovered that her husband to be, Alfred Wells Cantrill, born in Foleshill near Coventry, was actually working in Birmingham in a drapery shop according to the 1861 census. Their meeting at some point in Birmingham before 1865 would seem more likely if they both lived there.
 
On the 1861 census there is a William Smith (Sawyer) at 111 Great Charles Street, may be remarried wife 25 years old
Thanks so much for your efforts….this is the first time I’ve seen evidence of a sawyer named William Smith anywhere! I could look into this to see if it’s a possibility of him having remarried. Thanks again!
 
Back
Top