I
ian_george
Guest
I'm hoping that someone might be able to help me figure out why great grandmother's family left the Birmingham area for New Zealand in about 1855 and returned back to Birmingham area in about 1873.
There are also some little wrinkles that are making this extra tricky.
Anyone up for a puzzle?
The clearest place to start is 1881 census record for Footherley, Shenstone household of Thomas George.
It shows Thomas living with his new wife Harriet (nee Clarke) and her family:
1881 England Census
about Thomas George
Name:Thomas GeorgeAge:25 Estimated Birth Year:abt 1856 Relation:Head Spouse's Name:HarrietGender:MaleWhere born:Middleton, Warwickshire, EnglandCivil Parish:Shenstone County/Island:Staffordshire Country:England Street address:FootherleyCondition as to marriage:MarriedEducation:
Employment status:
View Image
Occupation:Farmer Of 14 AcresRegistration district:Lichfield Sub registration district:Lichfield ED, institution, or vessel:28 Neighbors:View others on page Household Members:NameAgeAdelaide Clarke46 Adelaide Clarke15 Elizabeth Clarke6 Marion Clarke5 Tarton Clarke8 William Clarke56 Harriet George23 Thomas George25 View
Original
Record


View original image
Children here are all those of Adelaide and William Clarke -- with Harriet as their oldest. Both Adelaide (my great grandmother) and her sister Adelaide are listed as born in New Zealand (Harriet in 1858 and Adelaide in 1866 -- both born in Christchurch, according to later census records).
Since Harriet's middle name was Rudd and 1841 / 1851 / 1861 census records show William living on the farm of Martha Rudd (I'm pretty sure that his mother was Elizabeth Rudd), I'm quite sure that William is her father -- and I would assume that he is the father of all other children too.
What perplexes me is that I can clearly see William in 1861 census records in Morville, Staffs-- which would have been 3 years after Harriet was born in NZ and 6 years before Adelaide was born in NZ).
Someone else on this forum was also kind enough to find a marriage record for a Clarke-Perry marriage in Birmingham are approx 1863 -- which also doesn't fit with Adelaide's 1866 birth in NZ.
Also of interest is the fact that Adelaide shows up living with her grandfather Thomas Harriman Perry's family in 1871 census record -- though William and Adelaide and the rest of their family are apparently still in NZ (or at least not easily findable in UK census records)
This might be too complicated and poorly described for anyone even to be interested or willing to help, but I figure it's worth a shot anyway. I would think that there probably weren't a lot of family's that migrated to NZ and back in the 1850s.
Another option here is that there was some kind of crime involved, but my grandmother said that Adelaide was a school teacher.
Another clue is that my grandmother said that the family arrived back from NZ when Harriet was 6 weeks old. I always thought that she meant to say Adelaide was 6 weeks old, but perhaps this is evidence of multiple trips?
I would have thought that a sea voyage from NZ to Birmingham would have taken several weeks or months at that time -- and likely quite an unpleasant ordeal for the most part -- which would have made it unlikely that the family would have made more than 1 trip out and 1 trip back
Anyway, thanks for reading and for any tips that you might care to share
The whole thing kind of reminds me of The Piano now that I think of it
There are also some little wrinkles that are making this extra tricky.
Anyone up for a puzzle?
The clearest place to start is 1881 census record for Footherley, Shenstone household of Thomas George.
It shows Thomas living with his new wife Harriet (nee Clarke) and her family:
1881 England Census
about Thomas George
Name:Thomas GeorgeAge:25 Estimated Birth Year:abt 1856 Relation:Head Spouse's Name:HarrietGender:MaleWhere born:Middleton, Warwickshire, EnglandCivil Parish:Shenstone County/Island:Staffordshire Country:England Street address:FootherleyCondition as to marriage:MarriedEducation:
Employment status:

View Image
Occupation:Farmer Of 14 AcresRegistration district:Lichfield Sub registration district:Lichfield ED, institution, or vessel:28 Neighbors:View others on page Household Members:NameAgeAdelaide Clarke46 Adelaide Clarke15 Elizabeth Clarke6 Marion Clarke5 Tarton Clarke8 William Clarke56 Harriet George23 Thomas George25 View
Original
Record



Children here are all those of Adelaide and William Clarke -- with Harriet as their oldest. Both Adelaide (my great grandmother) and her sister Adelaide are listed as born in New Zealand (Harriet in 1858 and Adelaide in 1866 -- both born in Christchurch, according to later census records).
Since Harriet's middle name was Rudd and 1841 / 1851 / 1861 census records show William living on the farm of Martha Rudd (I'm pretty sure that his mother was Elizabeth Rudd), I'm quite sure that William is her father -- and I would assume that he is the father of all other children too.
What perplexes me is that I can clearly see William in 1861 census records in Morville, Staffs-- which would have been 3 years after Harriet was born in NZ and 6 years before Adelaide was born in NZ).
Someone else on this forum was also kind enough to find a marriage record for a Clarke-Perry marriage in Birmingham are approx 1863 -- which also doesn't fit with Adelaide's 1866 birth in NZ.
Also of interest is the fact that Adelaide shows up living with her grandfather Thomas Harriman Perry's family in 1871 census record -- though William and Adelaide and the rest of their family are apparently still in NZ (or at least not easily findable in UK census records)
This might be too complicated and poorly described for anyone even to be interested or willing to help, but I figure it's worth a shot anyway. I would think that there probably weren't a lot of family's that migrated to NZ and back in the 1850s.
Another option here is that there was some kind of crime involved, but my grandmother said that Adelaide was a school teacher.
Another clue is that my grandmother said that the family arrived back from NZ when Harriet was 6 weeks old. I always thought that she meant to say Adelaide was 6 weeks old, but perhaps this is evidence of multiple trips?
I would have thought that a sea voyage from NZ to Birmingham would have taken several weeks or months at that time -- and likely quite an unpleasant ordeal for the most part -- which would have made it unlikely that the family would have made more than 1 trip out and 1 trip back
Anyway, thanks for reading and for any tips that you might care to share
The whole thing kind of reminds me of The Piano now that I think of it