• Welcome to this forum . We are a worldwide group with a common interest in Birmingham and its history. While here, please follow a few simple rules. We ask that you respect other members, thank those who have helped you and please keep your contributions on-topic with the thread.

    We do hope you enjoy your visit. BHF Admin Team

17th Century Kings Norton pubs and ale houses

Peter Faulkner

knowlegable brummie
I'm hoping someone can help with two questions relating to my 10th great grandfather Francis Potter, who was born probably in the 1570s and died in 1634 in Kings Norton. His will in 1634 named him as a vintner (and something else... which is my second question below!). In Quarter Sessions in 1631 he was referred to as a vintner and "licensed to keep a common alehouse". Quarter sessions in 1620 referred to him as a Yeoman, and sessions in 1609 called for his "appearance to answer for selling ale without a license".

I'm wondering if it is possible to identify which establishment he owned or rented at that time. I can't find online which pubs and inns were around in Kings Norton in the early 1600s (although I understand both the Saracen's Head and the Ship Inn then known as the Anchor existed in the 1650s). Of course, as an alehouse keeper, it may not have even had a name - those others are inns which I believe were more "upmarket" than an alehouse. Does anyone have any idea how I could identify where Francis Potter served ale?

My second question relates to his will. It seems to say "I, Francis Potter of Kings Norton in the county of Worcester, jupolder and vintener, ..." but I have no idea what a "jupolder" is or even if I am reading the handwriting correctly. Comparing letters to other similar ones in the will it certainly looks like "jupolder". Here is an image of it; any observations would be greatly appreciated:

Francis Potter will.jpg

Thanks,
Peter
 
Could the word be 'supplier'? Just making a guess here - it can be quite difficult to read some writing from that long ago!
 
I would agree with it probably being "supplier".
with regards to the pub, I think it should be noted that the area considered as Kings Norton was likely to be larger than what we today would think of as Kings Norton, including Stirchley, wythall and Rednal. Below is the description of Kings Norton from the 1860 Post Office directory, which probab ly would be the same area as in the 1600s.

ScreenHunter 604.jpg
 
Thanks both. I can see why you say "supplier", which also makes sense in context, but when I compare the letter formations, I see the following comparisons:

"j" as in "joseph" - joseph.jpg
"po" as in "dispose" - dispose.jpg
"ld" as in "eldest" - eldest.jpg

Compared to this mystery word: supplier.jpg

I guess the first letter COULD be s as in "shillings" - shillings.jpg but as written it looks identical to the J in Joseph above.

Mike, thanks for the Directory description. I guess I was assuming that in the early 1600s Kings Norton would have been a much smaller place and if referred to in a will would be more likely the town/village rather than the parish, but I do take your point that it could be a wider area (which makes identifying one alehouse even harder!!).
 
Back
Top