• Welcome to this forum . We are a worldwide group with a common interest in Birmingham and its history. While here, please follow a few simple rules. We ask that you respect other members, thank those who have helped you and please keep your contributions on-topic with the thread.

    We do hope you enjoy your visit. BHF Admin Team

Search results

  1. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    Janice, regarding your recent posts: MARTHA AND CHARLES Yes, you were spot on with the row of houses. Thanks. This question of Charles's location from around 1919 for a short period has always been a bit of a mystery to us. Clearly, he had a spell in Station Road in 1920. I don't think it is...
  2. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    At the risk of drifting further off-topic, I'll just contribute a few words about the significance to me of Station Road, Knowle. I'm writing about what are now Nos. 152, 152A, 150 and 148, once known by names only and in the case of no. 148 "Salisbury". 152 and 152A are two halves of a...
  3. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    Thanks for that, MWS. Blimey, the area seems to have been 100% redeveloped! You have to refer to the old map to obtain even the slightest idea of what life must have been like for everyone there. (The one favourable thing was that NO ONE had a lengthy commute to work!) I have yet to work out...
  4. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    Yes, Janice, Salisbury was the house in which my mother spent much of her childhood. I suspect that Charles was living next door or next door but one. I did quite a bit of work on all that some years ago but didn't put it online because it contained personal information belonging to others which...
  5. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    The 1921 Knowle address, please, if available. (Will come back to Mrs Steadman later). Chris
  6. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    MWS - thanks and no, I didn't know that and my brother didn't pick it up. The long awaited son and brother, no doubt doted on by parents and sisters during his short life and then lost. He had appeared five years after the youngest daughter, Louisa/Lou. You can imagine the grief. Janice -...
  7. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    Thanks, Janice, again, great! They were only married in the January and so just crept into the 1921. On Charles and Leamington, also 1921. Would you be kind enough to see whether there was a Mrs. Steadman, also in Leamington at the same time, please? There was quiet talk of an "association"...
  8. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    The more you think about it, the more possible it becomes, provided there was an early docking on the 2nd. Or an overnight train. Whatever happened, poor old George Walter would have been a right old state before the formalities, trying desperately to meet his, probably self-inflicted...
  9. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    I think there was some confusion over home addresses, business addresses and dual addresses, Janice. It appears that my brother was able to access hard copies of various local directories and did his best to interpret them. The moves are bewildering, over just a decade. My father's 1974 notes...
  10. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    Thank you for further invaluable contributions. Various points arising: MARY: Mystery of her marriage date versus date of arrival New York. A very good point! The juxtaposition of these two dates is so near inexplicable as to make them virtually an impossibility. But, presumably, the documents...
  11. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    The problem with that is that, as far as we can tell or so it seems, Mary died childless. This doesn't mean of course that a child never existed or that she might have not gone to full term ......... Or perhaps the question of respectability? They were at the same address from the moment of...
  12. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    Well, here's to nosiness and Cheers, Janice!! No, I have no originals other than what the two of you have kindly posted. My brother had access to Census records only up to 1891 and didn't reproduce them anywhere. Chris PS And thanks for 1901 and 1911. Haven't examined yet.
  13. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    I'm still pinching myself to realise just how much information has been so generously provided to me about my grandmother's siblings - there were five daughters of Joseph and Elizabeth (Parkes): Ann/Annie, my mother Martha, Selina Elizabeth, Mary/May, and Louisa/Lou. This thread was all started...
  14. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    I feel that there has to be something further in her motivation than job-seeking, important as that would have been to her - something more personal, perhaps. Why swap one heavily industrialised area for another, so far away from her roots and where her children remained? Perhaps Albert, for...
  15. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    I had assumed (and probably without good reason) that the whole family, including Solomon, had moved up there. Possibly she disappeared after establishing the children comfortably with her mother and thus ensuring their well-being. But again, why? Chris
  16. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    Wonderful! That explains a lot. I wonder if she ever saw any 15 shillings; I doubt it and the emigration would certainly have put an end to it, anyway. Poor Elizabeth, I wonder how she survived, with four young children. Grannie Bannister to the rescue, by the sound of it. But she never came...
  17. ChrisM

    happy birthday pjmburns (janice)

    A very happy birthday, Janice. Have a lovely day and celebrate wildly (but only so far as it doesn't curtail the time spent thinking about my Bannister family!!!.........) Chris x
  18. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    Whilst Selina Elizabeth is a bit of a side issue to the life of her sisters, Martha and Mary, nevertheless her story is fascinating! And reinforces the remarkable links which this Black Country family had, and the Birmingham families to which they were connected, with the USA. I have been...
  19. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    This would explain the four children being brought up by "Grannie" Mary (Parkes) Bannister. Perhaps the declaration in the USA was a white lie, to circumvent the problem of obtaining a death certificate for Selina, or some other documentation, from the U.K. Assuming that he WAS a widower and...
  20. ChrisM

    BANNISTER, Mary and Martha

    This was my brothers take on Selina Elizabeth: "The third arrival was Selina Elizabeth, born on 14 May 1876 at 58 Garrett's Lane. In the 1891 Census, she is shown as living with the family, aged 14, and employed as a Chain Maker. Subsequently she married, on 23 October 1892, at the Parish...
Back
Top