• Welcome to this forum . We are a worldwide group with a common interest in Birmingham and its history. While here, please follow a few simple rules. We ask that you respect other members, thank those who have helped you and please keep your contributions on-topic with the thread.

    We do hope you enjoy your visit. BHF Admin Team

MWS's latest activity

  • MWS
    MWS reacted to pjmburns's post in the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha with Appreciate Appreciate.
    I think death is 1949 - perhaps a typo?
  • MWS
    MWS replied to the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha.
    In 1911 they are also in Jarrow. She is listed as Elsie, he is listed as an American resident and they say they were married in 1902.
  • MWS
    MWS replied to the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha.
    I doubt I would have been able to conform this before the 1921 census was released but I've found what happened to Selina and probably...
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to Pedrocut's post in the thread Streetsbrook Road, Solihull. with Appreciate Appreciate.
    Streetsbrook Road, Solihull. Photographed by J.E. Hall. General view of road showing fording bridge. 1921. (Birmingham Archives and...
  • MWS
    MWS replied to the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha.
    There is a naturalization record for him in 1914 on which gives his birthplace as Staffordshire and an arrival date of 28 Jan 1902. His...
  • MWS
    MWS replied to the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha.
    How and why it came about I don't know but it seems probable that Solomon Stokes did emigrate and marry again. The details that are on...
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to pjmburns's post in the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha with Appreciate Appreciate.
    1899 Kelly's has a list of names under The Cedars. Including Charles The plaque is over 2 cottages/houses but there seem to be a block...
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to Richard Dye's post in the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha with Appreciate Appreciate.
    Great point regarding the number of records and the accuracy of any records. Much would depend on social standing, very few would be...
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to ChrisM's post in the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha with Appreciate Appreciate.
    This was my brothers take on Selina Elizabeth: "The third arrival was Selina Elizabeth, born on 14 May 1876 at 58 Garrett's Lane. In...
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to Vivienne14's post in the thread New Street - When It Was New with Appreciate Appreciate.
    I don't have a date or name of the artist for this one. You can see the spire of Christ Church in the distance, so the drawing is no...
  • MWS
    MWS replied to the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha.
    There's definitely nothing to contradict your father's memory so I'd take that as true. On a bit of a tangent, I notice that with...
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to pjmburns's post in the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha with Appreciate Appreciate.
    10 Highbury Road and the Cedars are not the same. The Cedars in near Grange Road and is still there with the name on the wall. 10 was...
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to ChrisM's post in the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha with Appreciate Appreciate.
    Another coincidence, MWS ...... the eldest sister of Martha and Mary was Annie (b1871). Annie married, in 1889, one James Priest, who...
  • MWS
    MWS replied to the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha.
    Unfortunately, there just aren't that many records around that time to know. Even the censuses, which are great, can be misleading...
  • MWS
    MWS replied to the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha.
    Another servant of Thomas Priest at the same time as Martha was an Amy Sidaway. The Sidaway name rang a bell, not sure where from but...
Back
Top