• Welcome to this forum . We are a worldwide group with a common interest in Birmingham and its history. While here, please follow a few simple rules. We ask that you respect other members, thank those who have helped you and please keep your contributions on-topic with the thread.

    We do hope you enjoy your visit. BHF Admin Team

MWS's latest activity

  • MWS
    MWS reacted to Richard Dye's post in the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha with Appreciate Appreciate.
    Great point regarding the number of records and the accuracy of any records. Much would depend on social standing, very few would be...
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to ChrisM's post in the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha with Appreciate Appreciate.
    This was my brothers take on Selina Elizabeth: "The third arrival was Selina Elizabeth, born on 14 May 1876 at 58 Garrett's Lane. In...
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to Vivienne14's post in the thread New Street - When It Was New with Appreciate Appreciate.
    I don't have a date or name of the artist for this one. You can see the spire of Christ Church in the distance, so the drawing is no...
  • MWS
    MWS replied to the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha.
    There's definitely nothing to contradict your father's memory so I'd take that as true. On a bit of a tangent, I notice that with...
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to pjmburns's post in the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha with Appreciate Appreciate.
    10 Highbury Road and the Cedars are not the same. The Cedars in near Grange Road and is still there with the name on the wall. 10 was...
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to ChrisM's post in the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha with Appreciate Appreciate.
    Another coincidence, MWS ...... the eldest sister of Martha and Mary was Annie (b1871). Annie married, in 1889, one James Priest, who...
  • MWS
    MWS replied to the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha.
    Unfortunately, there just aren't that many records around that time to know. Even the censuses, which are great, can be misleading...
  • MWS
    MWS replied to the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha.
    Another servant of Thomas Priest at the same time as Martha was an Amy Sidaway. The Sidaway name rang a bell, not sure where from but...
  • MWS
    MWS replied to the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha.
    Martha does appear on the 1891 census as a servant of a Thomas Priest, a chain manufacturer, in Rowley Regis. There is a danger in...
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to ChrisM's post in the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha with Appreciate Appreciate.
    Thank you for the further invaluable contributions, MWS, Janice and other members who are kind enough to be interested. I now know so...
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to Richard Dye's post in the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha with Appreciate Appreciate.
    Went to the address and listing by various brokerage firms who are required to post the “built date”. I have friend whose business is...
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to pjmburns's post in the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha with Appreciate Appreciate.
    Re photo on post 27. Vernis would have been 33 in 1935. She married in 1930 and it looks as if she died in 1942. Her daughter Nancy was...
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to Richard Dye's post in the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha with Appreciate Appreciate.
    This is our old house. built in 1929. They still build like that and the one in Ohio today. Most changes are internal.
  • MWS
    MWS reacted to ChrisM's post in the thread BANNISTER, Mary and Martha with Appreciate Appreciate.
    I have been doing a bit of delving, myself, at this end, into family records! How about this, just unearthed? Undoubtedly same day or...
  • MWS
    MWS replied to the thread Dowdall Christopher John.
    A different one I suspect, the one of King Edward's Road appears to have been born 1944.
Back
Top